<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Second Revolution</title>
	<link>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/the-second-revolution</link>
	<description>The Holy Grail in history and in modern culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Grail Code&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chaucer&#8217;s rotten scribe</title>
		<link>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/the-second-revolution#comment-14420</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/the-second-revolution#comment-14420</guid>
					<description>[...] After I had finished writing about medieval writers and their intimacy with the words they wrote, I remembered I tiny poem by Chaucer that might seem to contradict me a bit. In a spirit of honesty, I reproduce it here (from Dr. Skeat’s edition): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After I had finished writing about medieval writers and their intimacy with the words they wrote, I remembered I tiny poem by Chaucer that might seem to contradict me a bit. In a spirit of honesty, I reproduce it here (from Dr. Skeat’s edition): [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
