<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words on paper (the second part)</title>
	<link>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/words-on-paper-the-second-part</link>
	<description>The Holy Grail in history and in modern culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: nenGyncsind</title>
		<link>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/words-on-paper-the-second-part#comment-28980</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/words-on-paper-the-second-part#comment-28980</guid>
					<description>Very good contents...  
http://danuegonax.com 
 The Regard! The Excellent forum! Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good contents&#8230;<br />
<a href='http://danuegonax.com' rel='nofollow'>http://danuegonax.com</a><br />
 The Regard! The Excellent forum! Thank you!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Grail Code&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chaucer&#8217;s rotten scribe</title>
		<link>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/words-on-paper-the-second-part#comment-15930</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.grailcode.com/archives/words-on-paper-the-second-part#comment-15930</guid>
					<description>[...] Still, what I said about the care it took to prepare a manuscript is true. Most writers didn’t have the luxury of a secretary, and even when they did, the rough copy went more slowly than it would with today’s handwriting. Scriveyn or no scriveyn, it took a lot more care to write in Walter Map’s time, and I still think that care comes through in the construction of the romances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Still, what I said about the care it took to prepare a manuscript is true. Most writers didn’t have the luxury of a secretary, and even when they did, the rough copy went more slowly than it would with today’s handwriting. Scriveyn or no scriveyn, it took a lot more care to write in Walter Map’s time, and I still think that care comes through in the construction of the romances. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
